{"id":10509,"date":"2020-08-14T10:11:39","date_gmt":"2020-08-14T14:11:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/?p=10509"},"modified":"2020-09-28T14:12:49","modified_gmt":"2020-09-28T18:12:49","slug":"masks-in-prisons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/2020\/08\/14\/masks-in-prisons\/","title":{"rendered":"Half of states fail to require mask use by correctional staff"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The best way to slow the spread of COVID-19 in state prisons is to reduce the population density, but <a href=\"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/2020\/08\/05\/jails-vs-prisons-update-2\/\">as we&#8217;ve found<\/a>, states are moving far too slowly in this regard. In this new analysis, we find that states are also failing at the most modest mitigation efforts imaginable: requiring correctional staff and incarcerated people to wear masks.<\/p>\n<p>Almost all states<sup id=\"fnref:1\"><a href=\"#fn:1\">1<\/a><\/sup> are distributing masks to staff and incarcerated people,<sup id=\"fnref:2\"><a href=\"#fn:2\">2<\/a><\/sup> but only half of all states are requiring that staff wear the masks at work. We examined the policies of each state&#8217;s Department of Corrections to see which states are requiring masks for staff.<\/p>\n<p class=\"caption featureimage\">\n<picture><source type=\"image\/webp\" srcset=\"\/\/static.prisonpolicy.org\/images\/staffmasksmap.webp?v=8\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/static.prisonpolicy.org\/images\/staffmasksmap.png?v=8\" alt=\"Map showing which states are requiring correctional staff to wear face masks.\" width=\"800\" height=\"600\">\n<\/picture>30 states currently require correctional facility staff to wear face masks, while 20 states and the District of Columbia do not. Map updated on August 24, 2020 following a report from the South Carolina Department of Corrections that they are requiring staff to wear masks, although no policy requiring masks is available to the public. (Data collected by the Prison Policy Initiative from Departments of Corrections policies and news reports.)<\/p>\n<p>Just because states require the use of masks by staff does not mean that the policy is adequately enforced. There have been a number of reports from incarcerated people that correctional staff have not been wearing masks appropriately when interacting with those who are in custody. In Arkansas, masks are required for staff, but an<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ualrpublicradio.org\/sites\/kuar\/files\/2020-04-21-DOC-Byers_email.pdf\"> internal email<\/a> from the state&#8217;s highest corrections official to the wardens of each prison in the state reveals that &#8220;hospitals are not wanting to treat our inmates because our staff are not following the [mask] guidelines that we are sending out.&#8221;<sup id=\"fnref:3\"><a href=\"#fn:3\">3<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Of course, even in states where masks are not required by correctional policy, staff can <i>choose<\/i> to wear them. But  reports from incarcerated people and their families suggest this is wishful thinking. For example, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gazettenet.com\/Columnist-Razvan-Sibii-34769961\">New Jersey<\/a> &#8212; a state where the COVID-19 pandemic hit prisons <a href=\"https:\/\/whyy.org\/articles\/despite-promise-of-release-n-j-has-highest-covid-19-prison-death-rate-in-the-nation\/\">early and hard<\/a> &#8212; staff are not required to wear masks and reports from inside say that many staff are not wearing masks.<sup id=\"fnref:4\"><a href=\"#fn:4\">4<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p>As we all know by now, the federal government&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/02\/29\/health\/coronavirus-n95-face-masks.html\">February guidance<\/a> discouraging masks quickly proved to be misguided, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/media\/releases\/2020\/p0714-americans-to-wear-masks.html\">most current research<\/a> makes it even clearer that masks benefit both the wearer <i>and<\/i> everyone else.<\/p>\n<p class=\"prelist\">Wearing masks protects the public:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li>In states that only required certain employees to wear masks, there was no effect on the county-level daily COVID-19 growth rate, but requiring everyone to wear masks results in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.healthaffairs.org\/doi\/10.1377\/hlthaff.2020.00818\">significant decline<\/a> in infections.<\/li>\n<li>Face masks have driven down rates of overall COVID infections, as seen in <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jama\/fullarticle\/2768533\">hospital<\/a> settings, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/07\/14\/health\/coronavirus-hair-salon-masks.html\">hair salons<\/a>, and on<a href=\"https:\/\/thorax.bmj.com\/content\/75\/8\/693\"> cruise ships<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Beyond COVID, masks have long been <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/21735402\/\">known<\/a> to reduce the likelihood of transmission of epidemic respiratory illnesses. This is particularly true in <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.plos.org\/plosone\/article?id=10.1371\/journal.pone.0029744\">community-living settings<\/a> like dense prisons.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"prelist\">Masks protect the individuals who wear them:<\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li>Wearing a mask<a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/23498357\/\"> reduces the likelihood<\/a> of contracting COVID-19.<\/li>\n<li>Even if you still contract COVID-19 while wearing a mask, the disease is more likely to be <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/07\/27\/health\/coronavirus-mask-protection.html?referringSource=articleShare\">mild or even asymptomatic<\/a>.<sup id=\"fnref:5\"><a href=\"#fn:5\">5<\/a><\/sup><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Requiring correctional staff to wear face masks is just commonsense: staff are responsible for most day-to-day movement in and out of prisons (and are therefore most likely to carry the virus in and out of them) and they are state employees who must adhere to state regulations and requirements. But states should not stop with mandating masks for staff; they should be requiring <i>everyone <\/i>in the facility to wear masks.<br \/>\nThe obvious implication of the science behind using masks is that the more people who wear masks, the slower the virus will spread. Yet while 27 states require correctional staff to wear masks, only 15 state prison systems require incarcerated people to wear masks.<sup id=\"fnref:6\"><a href=\"#fn:6\">6<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<p class=\"caption featureimage\">\n<picture><source type=\"image\/webp\" srcset=\"\/\/static.prisonpolicy.org\/images\/incarceratedmasksmap.webp?v=7\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/static.prisonpolicy.org\/images\/incarceratedmasksmap.png?v=7\" alt=\"Map showing which states are requiring incarcerated people to wear face masks.\" width=\"800\" height=\"600\">\n<\/picture> 15 states currently require incarcerated people to wear face masks, while 35 states and the District of Columbia do not. Strangely, Illinois is the only state that appears to require incarcerated people wear masks, but does not require the same for staff. Map updated on August 24, 2020 following a report from the South Carolina Department of Corrections that they are requiring incarcerated people to wear masks, although no policy requiring masks is available to the public. (Data collected by the Prison Policy Initiative from Departments of Corrections policies and news reports.)<\/p>\n<p>The fact that far fewer states require incarcerated people to wear masks than correctional staff may reflect some reluctance to create conflict with incarcerated people over potential enforcement issues. (A more cynical view might interpret this hands-off approach as a callous lack of concern about incarcerated people&#8217;s lives and health.) But if correctional agencies care about protecting incarcerated people and staff, they could craft policies that reward those who wear masks, instead of policies that threaten disciplinary action for non-compliance.<\/p>\n<p>We know that<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMp2005687?fbclid=IwAR2ZCntaDAKmLMzBX544lkRPL344bGMklN8mbghZkNgvU6XRoP0H9WLSF9A\"> reducing<\/a> the number of people behind bars is the best way to <a href=\"https:\/\/jamanetwork.com\/journals\/jamainternalmedicine\/fullarticle\/2765271\">slow the spread<\/a> of COVID-19 through prisons, jails, and their surrounding communities, but this analysis finds that many states are not even practicing the most basic preventative measure: requiring face masks in prisons, just as they are required by many states in other public spaces. State prison systems need to catch up before it&#8217;s too late.<\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"footnotes\">\n<h2>Footnotes<\/h2>\n<ol class=\"list\">\n<li class=\"footnote\" id=\"fn:1\">\n<p>Publicly available information indicates that the Department of Corrections in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RhodeIslandDOC\/posts\/3103767523013489\">Rhode Island <\/a>and the <a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20200430172412\/https:\/\/doc.dc.gov\/page\/coronavirus-prevention\">District of Columbia<\/a> are providing masks to staff, but there is no available information about these Departments of Correction providing masks to incarcerated people.<a href=\"#fnref:1\" title=\"return to article\"> &#160;&#8617;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"footnote\" id=\"fn:2\">\n<p>It is worth noting that mask distribution in prisons across the U.S. has been fueled in part by outside charitable organizations <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/jay-z-meek-mill-reform-alliance-surgical-masks-10-million-jails-prisons\/\">donating<\/a> over $10 million worth of personal protective equipment, including face masks.<a href=\"#fnref:2\" title=\"return to article\"> &#160;&#8617;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"footnote\" id=\"fn:3\">\n<p>Arkansas is not the only state with staff who are not adhering to the policy that explicitly requires them to wear masks. For example, reports of staff not wearing masks &#8211; despite official requirements &#8211; have surfaced in state prisons in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclumich.org\/en\/news\/unprotected-prison-pleas-help-inside\">Michigan<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/vtdigger.org\/2020\/04\/27\/springfield-prison-leader-steps-aside-temporarily-after-mask-snafu-by-staff\/\">Vermont<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcconnecticut.com\/news\/local\/connecticut-inmate-speaks-out-on-coronavirus-in-prison\/2285391\/\">Connecticut,<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/vtdigger.org\/2020\/04\/27\/springfield-prison-leader-steps-aside-temporarily-after-mask-snafu-by-staff\/\">Wisconsin<\/a>.<a href=\"#fnref:3\" title=\"return to article\"> &#160;&#8617;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"footnote\" id=\"fn:4\">\n<p>Reports from other states without staff mask policies &#8211; including <a href=\"https:\/\/bangordailynews.com\/2020\/05\/20\/news\/as-maine-prisons-record-1st-case-of-coronavirus-we-need-to-find-it-and-shut-it-off-now\/\">Maine<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nevadacurrent.com\/2020\/07\/12\/pandemic-and-prison-policies-combine-to-stress-families-of-nevadas-incarcerated\/\">Nevada<\/a> &#8211; suggest that prison staff are not choosing to wear masks of their own accord. Although the federal prison system was outside the scope of this survey, it is relevant to note that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.themarshallproject.org\/2020\/08\/13\/con-air-is-spreading-covid-19-all-over-the-federal-prison-system\">reports<\/a> from both staff and incarcerated people indicate that the U.S. Marshals are transporting people without masks and without adequate physical distancing.<a href=\"#fnref:4\" title=\"return to article\"> &#160;&#8617;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"footnote\" id=\"fn:5\">\n<p>This <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11606-020-06067-8\">study<\/a> was published on July 31st and is based on the most current understanding of the virus.<a href=\"#fnref:5\" title=\"return to article\"> &#160;&#8617;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"footnote\" id=\"fn:6\">\n<p>As of August 1st, most state prison systems are providing masks to both correctional staff and the in-custody population. Based on the available information from Rhode Island and the District of Columbia, it is possible &#8211; although unlikely &#8211; that Rhode Island and the District are not providing masks to incarcerated. The correctional policies on masks in both Rhode Island and D.C. mention providing staff with masks, but we could not find any mention of providing masks to incarcerated people and they failed to respond to our inquiries prior to publication of this report.  <a href=\"#fnref:6\" title=\"return to article\"> &#160;&#8617;<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Appendix table<\/h2>\n<table id=\"maskpolicytable\">\n<caption>\nCollected by the Prison Policy Initiative from individual state policies and news reports. Last updated August 24, 2020. (The imprecise dates from Alaska, South Carolina, and Texas reflect how those states reported the information to us.)<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>State<\/th>\n<th>Announcement of providing masks to staff<\/th>\n<th>Announcement of providing masks to incarcerated people<\/th>\n<th>Announcement that masks are required for staff<\/th>\n<th>Announcement that masks are required for incarcerated people<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Alabama<\/td>\n<td>4\/1\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/1\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Alaska<\/td>\n<td>Late March<\/td>\n<td>4\/14\/20<\/td>\n<td>7\/22\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Arizona<\/td>\n<td>4\/7\/20<\/td>\n<td>7\/2\/20<\/td>\n<td>6\/15\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Arkansas<\/td>\n<td>4\/2\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/2\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/15\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/15\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>California<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Colorado<\/td>\n<td>4\/16\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/16\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/16\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Connecticut<\/td>\n<td>4\/16\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/16\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/22\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/22\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Delaware<\/td>\n<td>4\/10\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/10\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>District of Columbia<\/td>\n<td>4\/30\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Florida<\/td>\n<td>4\/11\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/30\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/30\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/30\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Georgia<\/td>\n<td>5\/14\/20<\/td>\n<td>5\/14\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hawaii<\/td>\n<td>4\/10\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/10\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/30\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Idaho<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>6\/24\/20<\/td>\n<td>6\/29\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Illinois<\/td>\n<td>4\/2\/20<\/td>\n<td>5\/4\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>5\/4\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Indiana<\/td>\n<td>4\/22\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/22\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Iowa<\/td>\n<td>4\/10\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/10\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/11\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Kansas<\/td>\n<td>4\/23\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/23\/20<\/td>\n<td>7\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>7\/3\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Kentucky<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>7\/10\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Louisiana<\/td>\n<td>4\/9\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/9\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Maine<\/td>\n<td>4\/15\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/15\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Maryland<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Massachusetts<\/td>\n<td>5\/4\/20<\/td>\n<td>5\/4\/20<\/td>\n<td>5\/4\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Michigan<\/td>\n<td>3\/26\/20<\/td>\n<td>3\/26\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Minnesota<\/td>\n<td>4\/2\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/2\/20<\/td>\n<td>6\/16\/20<\/td>\n<td>6\/16\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Mississippi<\/td>\n<td>4\/27\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/27\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/16\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Missouri<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Montana<\/td>\n<td>4\/17\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/17\/20<\/td>\n<td>6\/12\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Nebraska<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Nevada<\/td>\n<td>5\/7\/20<\/td>\n<td>6\/24\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>New Hampshire<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/28\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/21\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>New Jersey<\/td>\n<td>3\/25\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/16\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>New Mexico<\/td>\n<td>4\/28\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/28\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>New York<\/td>\n<td>4\/9\/20<\/td>\n<td>5\/7\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/15\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>North Carolina<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/21\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>North Dakota<\/td>\n<td>3\/26\/20<\/td>\n<td>3\/25\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ohio<\/td>\n<td>4\/30\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/30\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Oklahoma<\/td>\n<td>4\/1\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/1\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Oregon<\/td>\n<td>4\/2\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/2\/20<\/td>\n<td>5\/14\/20<\/td>\n<td>8\/20\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Pennsylvania<\/td>\n<td>3\/25\/20<\/td>\n<td>3\/25\/20<\/td>\n<td>3\/31\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rhode Island<\/td>\n<td>4\/9\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>South Carolina<\/td>\n<td>4\/7\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/7\/20<\/td>\n<td>April<\/td>\n<td>April<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>South Dakota<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tennessee<\/td>\n<td>4\/9\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/9\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Texas<\/td>\n<td>4\/5\/20<\/td>\n<td>Late April<\/td>\n<td>4\/5\/20<\/td>\n<td>Late April<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Utah<\/td>\n<td>4\/14\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/14\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Vermont<\/td>\n<td>4\/8\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/8\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/9\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/9\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Virginia<\/td>\n<td>3\/23\/20<\/td>\n<td>3\/23\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Washington<\/td>\n<td>4\/3\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/17\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/10\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/17\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>West Virginia<\/td>\n<td>4\/24\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/24\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Wisconsin<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>7\/6\/20<\/td>\n<td>7\/6\/20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Wyoming<\/td>\n<td>4\/17\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/17\/20<\/td>\n<td>4\/17\/20<\/td>\n<td>Not applicable<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>States are not reducing their populations sufficiently to slow the spread of COVID-19, and our survey reveals that 20 states are not even requiring masks to be worn by staff and most are not requiring incarcerated people to wear them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52,1],"tags":[55],"coauthors":[33,74],"class_list":["post-10509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-briefings","category-uncategorized","tag-health"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10509"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10509\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10708,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10509\/revisions\/10708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10509"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=10509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}