{"id":10713,"date":"2020-10-02T12:00:31","date_gmt":"2020-10-02T16:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/?p=10713"},"modified":"2020-10-02T12:00:31","modified_gmt":"2020-10-02T16:00:31","slug":"jail-voting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/2020\/10\/02\/jail-voting\/","title":{"rendered":"New 50-state report from Prison Policy Initiative and Rainbow PUSH Coalition provides a roadmap to normalizing voting from jail"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\nThis morning, the Prison Policy Initiative and the Reverend Jesse Jackson, Sr.\u2019s Rainbow PUSH Coalition released <i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/reports\/jail_voting.html\">Eligible, but Excluded,<\/a> <\/i>a roadmap to expanding voting access for people incarcerated in local jails who are already eligible to vote.<b> <\/b>The report explains &#8211; via a 50-state table and flowchart &#8211; that <b>most of the 746,000 people in local jails retain the right to vote. <\/b>The report then details the logistical barriers that prevent these voters from casting ballots, and strategies for bringing these barriers down.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cThousands of people in jails across America retain the right to vote, but they are denied that right in every election,\u201d Reverend Jackson said. \u201cMany of these voters are being held simply because they are poor and can\u2019t make bail. <b>This form of voter suppression is a truly heinous form of social injustice and civic indignity.<\/b> This report provides the data that will help us fight back against this injustice.  And fight we will!\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"featureimage1024\"> <picture><source type=\"image\/webp\" srcset=\"\/\/static.prisonpolicy.org\/images\/jail_voting.webp?v=2\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/\/static.prisonpolicy.org\/images\/jail_voting.png?v=2\" alt=\"flowchart explaining restrictions on people voting from jail\" width=\"1024\" height=\"600\">\n<\/picture><\/p>\n<p class=\"prelist\">\nThe report provides an in-depth explanation of the most common issues preventing people in jail from voting, including:\n<\/p>\n<ul class=\"list\">\n<li><b>Confusion about who is eligible to vote,<\/b> among election officials as well as incarcerated people themselves<\/li>\n<li><b>Registration-related barriers<\/b> such as restrictive deadlines and a lack of access to personal information<\/li>\n<li><b>Ballot-casting barriers <\/b>including strict for-cause absentee voting policies<\/li>\n<li><b>Population churn in jails<\/b>, which means that some people who register to vote in jail may not be incarcerated on Election Day.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\nThe report goes on to offer <b>29 strategies <\/b>for <b>advocates, state legislatures, election officials, and sheriffs <\/b>to enable people in jail to exercise the franchise.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn an era of criminal justice reform, protecting the right to vote for persons held in jail is among the most important reforms,\u201d said Reverend Dr. S. Todd Yeary, co-author of the report. \u201cThe state-by-state analysis in this report sets the landscape for the policy fight to protect the right to vote for persons who are legally eligible to cast a ballot, but are unjustly prevented from doing so. <b>This is our justice roadmap for issue advocacy in upcoming state legislative sessions,<\/b> as well as policy changes by sheriffs, prosecutors, and governors across the country.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<p>\nRead the full report at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/reports\/jail_voting.html\">https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/reports\/jail_voting.html.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This morning, the Prison Policy Initiative and the Reverend Jesse Jackson, Sr.\u2019s Rainbow PUSH Coalition released Eligible, but Excluded, a roadmap to expanding voting access for people incarcerated in local jails who are already eligible to vote. The report explains &#8211; via a 50-state table and flowchart &#8211; that most of the 746,000 people in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[46],"class_list":["post-10713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-press-release","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10713"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10713\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10727,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10713\/revisions\/10727"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10713"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=10713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}