{"id":11045,"date":"2020-12-02T13:27:35","date_gmt":"2020-12-02T18:27:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/?p=11045"},"modified":"2026-01-21T14:36:59","modified_gmt":"2026-01-21T19:36:59","slug":"jail-and-prison-covid-populations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/2020\/12\/02\/jail-and-prison-covid-populations\/","title":{"rendered":"As COVID-19 continues to spread rapidly, state prisons and local jails have failed to mitigate the risk of infection behind bars"},"content":{"rendered":"

This article was updated on October 21st, 2021<\/a> with more recent jail and prison population data. That version<\/a> should be used instead of this one.<\/p>\n

\nSince the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the strategy to slowing<\/a> its spread behind bars was clear: Reduce the number of people in jails and prisons. In March, public health and medical officials were already warning<\/a> that incarcerated people would be uniquely vulnerable to the spread of the disease and its most serious medical consequences, due to their close quarters and high rates of preexisting health conditions.\n<\/p>\n

\nAnd yet, more than eight months after the World Health Organization declared<\/a> the pandemic, prisons and jails have generally failed to reduce their populations enough to protect the health and lives of those who are incarcerated. While state prison populations have slowly declined from pre-pandemic levels, the pace of these modest reductions has slowed since the spring, even as national infection rates continue to rise. And county jails — which made promising reductions in the spring — have failed to sustain those reforms.\n<\/p>\n

\n\"graph\n<\/picture>Despite the rising national case rate of COVID-19, the number of people held in 514 county jails across the country has increased over the past four months. This graph contains aggregated data collected by NYU’s Public Safety Lab<\/a> and updates a graph in our September 10th briefing<\/a>. This graph includes all jails where the Lab was able to report data on March 10th and for at least 75% of the days in our research period. (The Public Safety Lab is continuing to add more jails to its data collection and data is not available for all facilities for all days.) To see county level data for all 514 jails included in this analysis, see Appendix A<\/a>. This graph presents the data as 7-day rolling averages, which smooths out most of the variations caused by individual facilities not being reported on particular days. The temporary population drops\/increases during the last weeks of May and August, as well as the first week of November, are the result of more facilities than usual not being included in the dataset for various reasons, rather than any known policy changes.<\/p>\n

\nAs a result of these failures to sufficiently decarcerate, the early warnings of health experts have come true: the COVID-19 case rate in state and federal prisons is more than four times<\/a> as high as that of the general public, and the death rate is more than twice as high. The Texas prison system alone has had more COVID-19 cases<\/a> than in four states and Washington, D.C.<\/a> combined. And since people who work in prisons and jails regularly return to their communities, correctional facilities are dangerously poised to become incubators for the disease and contribute to rising infection rates in surrounding communities.\n<\/p>\n

\nInitially, many local officials — including sheriffs, prosecutors, and judges — responded quickly to reduce jail populations. In a national sample of 514 county jails of varying sizes, most (88%) decreased their populations from March to July, resulting in an average population reduction across all 514 jails of 26%.1<\/a><\/sup> These population reductions came as the result of various policy changes<\/a>, including police issuing citations in lieu of arrests, prosecutors declining to charge people for “low-level offenses,” courts reducing cash bail amounts, and jail administrators releasing people detained pretrial or those serving short sentences for “nonviolent offenses.”\n<\/p>\n

\nBut now the data tells a different story. Since July, 77% of the jails in our sample had population increases, suggesting that the early reforms instituted to mitigate COVID-19 have largely been abandoned. For example, by mid-April, the Philadelphia city jail population reportedly dropped by more than 17% after city police suspended<\/a> low-level arrests and judges released<\/a> “certain nonviolent detainees” jailed for “low-level charges.” But on May 1st — as the pandemic raged on — the Philadelphia police force announced that they would resume arrests<\/a> for property crimes, effectively reversing the earlier reduction efforts. Similarly, on July 10th, the sheriff of Jefferson County, Alabama, announced that the jail would limit admissions<\/a> to only “violent felons that cannot make bond.”2<\/a><\/sup> That effort was quickly abandoned when the jail resumed normal admission operations<\/a> just one week later. The increasing jail populations across the country suggest that after the first wave of responses to COVID-19, many local officials have allowed jail admissions to return to business as usual.\n<\/p>\n

\nOn the other hand, state prison populations have continued to decline, but not quickly or significantly enough to slow the spread of COVID-19. Even in states where prison populations have dropped, there are still too many people behind bars to accommodate social distancing, effective isolation and quarantine, and increased health care requirements. For example, although California has reduced the state prison population by about 20% since January, the number of large COVID-19 outbreaks<\/a> in California state prisons suggests that the population reduction needs to be much more drastic. In fact, as of November 18th, California’s state prisons were still holding more people than they were designed for, at 105% of their design capacity<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n

\n\"graph\n<\/picture>Prison population data for 21 states where population data was readily available for January, May, July, August, September, October, and November, either directly from the state Departments of Correction or the Vera Institute of Justice. See our COVID-19 response tracker<\/a> for more information on many of the most important policy changes that led to these small reductions in some states. For the population data for these 21 states, see Appendix B.<\/a>
\nSharp-eyed readers may wonder if Connecticut and Vermont are showing larger declines than most other states because those two states have “unified” prison and jail systems. However, data from both states show that the bulk of their population reduction is coming from within the “sentenced” portion of their populations. (For the Connecticut data, see the Correctional Facility Population Count Report<\/a>, and for Vermont, see the daily population reports<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

\nEarly in the pandemic, North Dakota quickly reduced its prison population by 19% between January and May 2020, a trend that continued until the beginning of October. But over the past month this trend reversed and the states’ prison population actually started to increase (by 3% from October 8 to November 19). Now, North Dakota is experiencing the state’s first major outbreaks of COVID-19 in prison<\/a>. In one facility, the James River Correctional Center, more than half of the incarcerated population had active COVID-19 infections as of November 23rd.\n<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nAccording to a October 2020 report<\/a> from the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, the modest declines in prison populations can be largely attributed to changes in arrests, jail bookings, and court closures — not releases. Despite evidence that large-scale releases do not inherently endanger public safety<\/a>, states have elected to release people from prison on a mostly case-by-case basis, which the National Academies report describes as “procedurally slow and not well suited to crisis situations.”\n<\/p>\n

\nThankfully, some states have recognized the inefficiency of case-by-case releases and the necessity of larger-scale releases. For example, in New Jersey,3<\/a><\/sup> Governor Phil Murphy signed<\/a> bill S2519<\/a> in October, which allowed for the early release of people with less than a year left on their sentences. A few weeks after the bill was signed, more than 2,000 people were released<\/a> from New Jersey state prisons on November 4th.4<\/a><\/sup>\n<\/p>\n

\nPrisons and jails are notoriously dangerous places<\/a> during a viral outbreak, and continue to be a major source of a large number of infections in the U.S. The COVID-19 death rate in prisons is three times higher<\/a> than among the general U.S. population, even when adjusted for age and sex (as the prison population is disproportionately young and male). Since the early days of the pandemic, public health professionals<\/a>, corrections officials<\/a>, and criminal justice reform advocates<\/a> have agreed that decarceration is necessary to protect incarcerated people and the community-at-large from COVID-19. Despite this knowledge, state, federal, and local authorities have failed to reduce jail and prison populations on a major scale, which continues to put incarcerated people’s lives at risk — and by extension, the lives of everyone in greater communities where incarcerated people eventually return, and where correctional staff live and work.\n<\/p>\n

 
\n <\/p>\n

\n

Footnotes<\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. \n

    The NYU Public Safety Lab Jail Data Initiative<\/a> has collected jail populations for over 1,000 facilities from January to November. This sample includes jails of varying size, as well as geographic diversity. For each of our analyses of jail and prison populations during the pandemic (including our earlier analyses in May<\/a>, August<\/a>, and September<\/a>), we included all jails from this database that had population data available for at least 75% of the days in the period being studied, and had data going back to March 10. As time has passed, additional jails have been added to the Jail Data Initiative database, allowing us to increase the number of jails in our sample. For this November analysis, we included 514 jails. (We included all 514 jails that had at least 188 days worth of data, representing at least 75% of the days between March 10th and November 15th; had data available on March 10th; and continued to have data available after August 1st).  ↩<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    The news story<\/a> from Jefferson County does not make clear whether officials are using “violent” to refer to the crime a person is charged with, crimes of which they have already convicted, a label imposed on them by a risk assessment tool, or something else.  ↩<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    New Jersey is not included in the above graph of state prison population changes because the New Jersey Department of Correction has not published monthly population data for 2020. However, in an October 2020 press release<\/a>, Governor Phil Murphy claimed the population in state correctional facilities had “decreased by nearly 3,000 people (16%)” since March.  ↩<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    Soon after these releases, 88 people who were released under bill S2519 were quickly arrested<\/a> by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials. A spokesperson from ICE claimed that these 88 individuals were “violent offenders or have convictions for serious crimes such as homicide, aggravated assault, drug trafficking and child sexual exploitation.” However, these claims are brought into question when considering that the releases that took place under bill S2519 specifically excluded<\/a> “people serving time for murder or sexual assault” and those serving time for sexual offenses. Although we did not include ICE facilities in our analysis, there is evidence that ICE detention facilities have a COVID-19 case rate that is up to 13 times higher<\/a> than that of the general U.S. population.  ↩<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

      <\/p>\n

    \n

    Appendix A: County jail populations during COVID-19<\/h2>\n

    This table shows the jail populations for 514 county jails where data was available where data was available for March 10th (the day the pandemic was declared) and for 75% of the days between March 10th and November 15th. (This table is a subset of the population data available for over 1,000 local jails from the NYU Public Safety Lab Jail Data Initiative<\/a>.)<\/p>\n