{"id":232,"date":"2012-09-11T15:47:34","date_gmt":"2012-09-11T19:47:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/whatsnew\/?p=232"},"modified":"2013-05-28T19:07:39","modified_gmt":"2013-05-28T23:07:39","slug":"new-ppi-report-the-price-to-call-home-state-sanctioned-monopolization-in-the-prison-phone-industry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/2012\/09\/11\/new-ppi-report-the-price-to-call-home-state-sanctioned-monopolization-in-the-prison-phone-industry\/","title":{"rendered":"New PPI report &#8220;The Price To Call Home: State-Sanctioned Monopolization In The Prison Phone Industry&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/images\/reportthumbs\/price_call_home_250w.jpg\" alt=\"report thumbnail\" width=\"250\" height=\"340\" class=\"reportcover right\"  \/>A <a href=\"\/phones\/report.html\">new Prison Policy Initiative report<\/a> reveals that the monopolistic prison phone industry\u2019s high calling rates are jeopardizing public safety and taxing poor communities. The report calls on the FCC to set price caps that would allow incarcerated people to increase their chances of success upon release by staying connected to their families.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new Prison Policy Initiative report reveals that the monopolistic prison phone industry\u2019s high calling rates are jeopardizing public safety and taxing poor communities. The report calls on the FCC to set price caps that would allow incarcerated people to increase their chances of success upon release by staying connected to their families.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-phones","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=232"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}