{"id":7574,"date":"2018-05-31T13:14:51","date_gmt":"2018-05-31T17:14:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/?p=7574"},"modified":"2022-04-14T16:51:27","modified_gmt":"2022-04-14T20:51:27","slug":"fl_comment_letter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/2018\/05\/31\/fl_comment_letter\/","title":{"rendered":"Comment letter: Florida&#8217;s Department of Corrections should not reduce visitation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"\/scans\/FL_DOC_comment_visitation_30_May%20final_PDF.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/images\/FL_Comment_Ltr_5_31.png\" alt=\"comment letter\" style=\"border:#D3D3D3 2px solid\" width=\"250\" height=\"276\" class=\"right thumb250\" \/><\/a> <\/p>\n<p>\nFlorida&#8217;s Department of Corrections recently proposed new policies that would allow correctional facilities in the state to reduce their visitation hours by half, limiting opportunities for families to see their incarcerated loved ones in person. You&#8217;d be hard-pressed to find many people who actually believe reducing prison visits is a good idea, but the DOC has cited issues with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.miamiherald.com\/news\/local\/community\/miami-dade\/article201399549.html\">contraband and staff costs<\/a> as the impetus for the proposed changes.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nSenior Policy Analyst Jorge Renaud and I wrote a <a href=\"\/scans\/FL_DOC_comment_visitation_30_May%20final_PDF.pdf\">comment letter<\/a> opposing the proposed changes, citing established research that shows how reducing visitation is bad correctional policy. Moreover, we argued, it&#8217;s simply cruel:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Ensuring that incarcerated people maintain ample connection to the outside world is humane, cost-effective, and would result in less dangerous correctional facilities &#8211; to the benefit of everyone.<\/p>\n<p>The plan to reduce these visits in favor of for-profit video chatting will undoubtedly force the families of incarcerated people to visit stale, flatscreen kiosks inside of correctional facilities, or to pay high fees when video chatting from home (a service that is usually free). Both options trivialize the importance of family relationships during periods of incarceration.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\nReducing the opportunities incarcerated people have to see their families would be an unfortunate development in Florida&#8217;s justice system, which is already being criticized for cutting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sun-sentinel.com\/opinion\/editorials\/fl-op-editorial-prison-drug-treatment-cuts-20180530-story.html\">vital rehabilitative programs<\/a> this year.<\/p>\n<p>\nIf Florida would like to reduce the need for visitation (because of costs or contraband), reducing the overall prison population would be a good start.\n<\/p>\n<p><i>Update: check out journalist Ben Conarck&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/conarck\/status\/1002166528115134464\">twitter thread<\/a> for coverage of a public hearing on visitation in Florida. <\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In our letter to the Florida Department of Corrections, we explain why cutting visiting hours is bad policy and an inhumane practice. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"coauthors":[42],"class_list":["post-7574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-phones","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7574"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7574\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13531,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7574\/revisions\/13531"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7574"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prisonpolicy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=7574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}