This overview takes a brief look at trends within various parts of the crime control industry. It's a fair assumption that barring outside action, what happens tomorrow will resemble what happened yesterday. But with so many factors at play in the crime control industry, we should look at what influences the health of the industry in order to assess likely industry scenarios in the future.
Each section provides a short summary of the numerical trends, and then lists some factors that will determine what happens in the next two to five years. Many of these factors are directly or indirectly political, and therefore ripe for being influenced by advocacy efforts.
This graph represents the number of people in federal and state prisons (but not local jails) per 100,000 population. It shows how common incarceration is, regardless of changes in the total population size. We see that incarceration was relatively stable from the start of the statistics in 1925 through the early 1970s at about 100 per 100,000 residents. As of June 30, 2001, the U.S. imprisonment rate was 472 per 100,000 people. 1 Adding the 631,240 persons held in local jails creates an incarceration rate of 690 per 100,000. 2
From 1990 to 2001, the average growth in incarceration was 5.8% per year3, however, this was not a steady growth nor was it evenly distributed across the country. After peaking at 9% growth in 1994-1995, the growth rate dropped to 2.3% in 1999-2000 and 1% in 2000-2001. In the last year, most states had very small growth, and 11 states reduced their prisoner populations between mid-year 2000 and 2001. There were anomalies, however. New Mexico's prison population grew 15.4% and South Dakota's grew 7.3%.4 While the states restricted their combined growth to 4,329 prisoners, in that same period the federal prison system added 10,258 prisoners for a 7% growth rate.5
A large portion of the prison increase since 1990 has been from a decrease in prisoners being paroled and an increase in the frequency with which parolees are returned to prison for technical violations of parole terms without the commission of new crimes. Changes in sentencing laws requiring longer sentences have also played a major part. Political decisions like these outweigh the small changes in the crime rate from year to year.
This page is an excerpt from The Prison Index: Taking the Pulse of the Crime Control Industry (April 2003) by Peter Wagner, published by the Western Prison Project and the Prison Policy Initiative.
1 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners and Jail Inmates at Mid-year 2001, 5/10/02 revised edition, p. 3
2 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners and Jail Inmates at Mid-year 2001, 5/10/02 revised edition, Table 1.
3 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners and Jail Inmates at Mid-year 2001, 5/10/02 revised edition,p. 2.
4 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners 2001, Table 4.
5 Calculations based on Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners and Jail Inmates at Mid-year 2001, 5/10/02 revised edition, Table 2.
6 Blumstein and Wallman ed, The Crime Drop in America (2000), p. 11.
7 Bureau of Prisons, Quick Facts, May 2002, viewed January 4, 2003, http://www.bop.gov/fact0598.html.
8 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners 2001, p. 12, 14.
9 3993 per 100,000 civil labor force. Nils Christie, Crime Control as Industry, 2000 ed, p 141.
10 Calculations based on Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners and Jail Inmates at Mid-year 2001, 5/10/02 revised edition, Table 15.