HELP US END MASS INCARCERATIONThe Prison Policy Initiative uses research, advocacy, and organizing to dismantle mass incarceration. We’ve been in this movement for 23 years, thanks to individual donors like you.
The Prison Policy Initiative uses a number of different data sources to produce research exposing the harms of mass incarceration. Below we provide descriptions of and links to helpful sources we have used. These sources are organized in sections about policing, incarceration, community supervision and reentry, and special populations, and each source references an appendix that provides additional details about the data sources we discuss (e.g., how old is the data, are breakdowns along gender or racial categories available, etc.). Many national sources we use don’t show people the details of what’s happening in their communities; for that reason, we’ve provided starting points in the final section about local data to help people locate information about their counties, cities, and states.
If you have questions or we can be of more assistance, please contact us.
Policing
Crime rates
Do you want to know:
The crime rate in your state or city and how it has changed over time?
How the crime rate in your state compares to rates in other states?
How many women were arrested for robbery last year?
How many youths under 18?
How many assaults go unreported to police?
The difference between the number of police reports for assault and the number of people who report being assaulted?
Look to:
The FBI’s Crime Data Explorer
This tool will show you how many crimes have been reported to police either nationally or in a given state. If you need to know who police are arresting (i.e., how old, what race/ethnicity, and what sex), you’ll find that data under the Crime Data Explorer’s Arrest tab. (In 2021, the FBI changed the data collection system, resulting in a data gap as thousands of police agencies did not submit data in 2021. In 2022, the reporting and participation of agencies began to increase, but many large police agencies - including the NYPD and the LAPD - still had not submitted data under the new collection system. For more information on these data issues, see 4 Reasons We Should Worry About Missing Crime Data from the Marshall Project.)
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
This survey allows us to see the difference between the number of police reports for personal and property crimes (or the number of arrests for those crimes) and the number of people and households that actually experience being personally attacked, threatened, stolen from, etc. It’s a Bureau of Justice (BJS) survey that asks U.S. households to report their personal experiences with crime; the answers become the basis for the data points in publications like Violent Victimization by Race and Ethnicity and Criminal Victimization.
BJS also offers two relevant data analysis tools that allow users to generate tables based on crime and arrest data including “offense,” police reporting, victim’s demographic information, incident characteristics, and more.
Beyond the data, BJS shares the details of its studies
Every BJS survey has a landing page helpful to people who want to dig deep into the data. Each landing page features a section where users can access details about the survey methodology, publications that have analyzed the survey data for you, links to the archived data, and the questionnaires used in each survey.
You may ask, how are the methodology and questionnaires helpful? The methodology is important for identifying special groups of people who may have been excluded from the survey (e.g., a survey that targets households would necessarily exclude the houseless population). The methodology also helps you identify the data sources you can take full advantage of without waiting for BJS’s next survey. For example, BJS periodically surveys every state and local law enforcement agency, and that can provide you with a template for gathering similar data from your local police department. That’s why the questionnaires section of each survey can be useful. Not only are they helpful for determining the specific data available for analysis through each survey, they’re also a good example of the kind of questions you might include in records requests to your local jail, police department, or prosecutor’s office.
Police contact
Do you want to know:
How many people call the police nationally to report crimes? How many people call the police for non-crime emergencies? How have these numbers changed over time?
What the racial, gender, and age breakdowns are for the people police pull over for traffic stops?
How often police contact results in police violence?
Look to:
The Police-Public Contact Survey
What happens when a person comes into contact with the police? Why has the contact happened in the first place? Did someone call the police, did the police officer stop someone in traffic, stop and frisk them on a sidewalk? This BJS survey answers these questions on a national level. Key reports produced from this survey include the Contacts Between Police and the Public series (updated every three years or so) and Police Use of Nonfatal Force, 2002-11.
The National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) Data Archive
This annual survey is useful for learning about who is coming into contact with the police in terms of characteristics like race, gender, health status, and drug use. The survey is not particularly focused on criminal legal system experiences, but it does ask respondents about lifetime and past year arrest history.1 The website offers a helpful tool with which you can compare the demographic and health information of people with these criminal legal system experiences against those who have not been arrested.
For example, users on the homepage can select from the Analyze Data dropdown. “Data Analysis System” takes users to a page with a “Start Analysis” panel on which users can select “NSDUH” for a list of surveys going back to 2002.
Clicking a survey will take users to a crosstab creator. Subjects related to Corrections are found under Special Topics. Users can, for example, populate the Row Variable with “# of Times Arrested and Booked Past 12 Months” and cross reference it with a Drug Treatment topic like “Ever Received Alcohol or Drug Treatment.”
You can find the user’s guide for SAMHSA’s Data Tools here.
Mapping Police Violence
This site allows users to view police killings since 2013, by state, local police department, by whether the officer was on duty and whether they were charged, and by victim characteristics such as race, gender, mental health status, whether they were armed, etc. The data have been analyzed to produce “scorecards” for each police department and sheriff’s department for which there are data.
Police Scorecard
This site offers a “scorecard” for police departments based on data from numerous government databases and the Mapping Police Violence database, supplemented by local agency publications and media reports. All the sources are listed here. The scorecards include information on arrests and police violence by race, disparities in arrests for low level offenses by race and ethnicity, and other detailed information about police departments and sheriff’s departments.
The National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP) data includes characteristics of people admitted to or released from state prisons, or in the year-end state prison populations including sex, offense type, age at and year of admission, type of admission, year of admission, age on December 31 of the reporting year, highest level of education, maximum sentence length, race/ethnicity, mandatory release year, parole eligibility year, and the projected release year.
The Survey of Prison Inmates (SPI)
This national BJS survey collects more detailed information about people in state and federal prisons than any other, and unlike most other studies, it collects information from incarcerated people themselves. Some important data points that it has that can be hard to find in other sources include:
Socioeconomic characteristics
Family backgrounds
Experiences in prison related to programming, discipline, health, and family contact
One clear benefit of this survey is that it provides more accurate data on race in prisons because the demographic information is gathered directly from the incarcerated people it describes rather than relying on prison records, which may reflect the guesses or assumptions of prison officials. One drawback is that the data cannot be broken down state-by-state — all findings are at the national level. There are also often long gaps between these surveys (e.g., until 2016, the most recent was in 2004).
The Prison Policy Initiative’s Research Library section on Incarceration Rates, Growth, and Causes curates all the policy-related research about incarceration trends that we learn about. Many other sections may be relevant to your research, however, so browse or search the fullResearch Library.
BJS shares a publication schedule for upcoming data
If you’re looking at information from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, you may want to see if the data you’re relying on is about to be updated. In order to see what information is scheduled for release in the current calendar year, see BJS’s Forthcoming Publications.
Jails
Do you want to know:
How many annual jail admissions there are?
Jail incarceration rates by race, ethnicity, and sex?
The percentage of people in jail being held pretrial? The number of people incarcerated for misdemeanors?
Look to:
The Census of Jails (COJ)
When policy makers say a jail is overcrowded, what does that mean in terms of data? It’s a comparison of the number of people in a jail to what’s called the jail’s “rated capacity” or “design capacity.”2 This BJS survey provides these data points - and more - for all local jails and the 12 Federal Bureau of Prisons facilities that function as jails.
The Annual Survey of Jails (ASJ)
This BJS survey provides national estimates on the number of people confined in jails based on a sample of about 950 local jails. Unlike the Census of Jails, this data is collected every year, and is helpful for tracking recent jail trends nationally. In years when the Census of Jails is not conducted, this survey is the basis of the annual BJS Jail Inmates report series.
The Vera Institute of Justice’s Incarceration Trends tool
This site provides incarceration trends by state, county, urbanicity (rural, urban, suburban, etc.), gender, race, and conviction status.
This tool has three main limitations:
Data does not include federal jails.
Not every county or state has data available for every metric, though most do, and Vera’s experts have created estimates for some of the missing data.
Although almost all other agencies calculate incarceration rates per 100,000 persons or per 100,000 adults, Vera calculates per 100,000 persons ages 15-64. However, the underlying dataset is available and users with data experience can calculate compatible rates per persons using the raw data and other available population estimates.
The NYU Public Safety Lab’s Jail Data Initiative
This program web-scrapes local jail rosters in hundreds of counties across the country. The data available varies by county, but it’s worth checking to see what data is available for your county. What’s available could include data about:
Racial disparities in admissions, population, and types of charges
Incarceration for failure to appear in court
Failure to pay fines or fees
Cannabis-related charges
Contempt of court
The Prison Policy Initiative’s Research Library section on Jails curates all the policy-related research about jails that we learn about.
The Survey of Prison Inmates
In addition to providing self-reported data on demographics, sentence lengths, and committing offenses for prison populations, this BJS survey alsoprovides data about:
Drug and alcohol use and treatment
Mental and physical health and treatment
Facility programs
Rule violations
A key report based on this survey is Alcohol and Drug Use and Treatment Reported by Prisoners. The health data from this survey and report are compatible with the data reported in previous years from the National Inmate Survey (see below), so you can see what has (or hasn’t) changed over the years.
Reuters Investigates: Dying Inside
This site collected jail-by-jail mortality data for each state through records requests in every jail whose population is 750 or more. While no longer an active data collection, the site features downloadable files that show deaths by cause and by county for each year from 2008-2019.
Huffington Post’s Jail Deaths database
This site collected data on people who died in jails and police lockups in the year after Sandra Bland’s death in July of 2015, based on record requests and monitoring news reports. While no longer an active data collection, this project and its related publications offer much more detail and context than government data collections, including the particular circumstances of many of those who lost their lives in jail.
The National Resource Center for Correctional Oversight (NRCCO)
This project from the Prison and Jail Innovation Lab (PJIL) at the Lyndon B Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin offers numerous resources regarding prison and jail oversight, including interactive maps comparing oversight bodies throughout the U.S. and profiles of these entities (coming soon).
How many adults are on parole or probation in your state? How these numbers have changed over time?
How much incarcerating people for technical probation and parole violations costs your state?
What the probation and parole outcomes are in your state, i.e., are people completing their supervision successfully or returning to custody?
What the estimated racial, gender, and age breakdowns of recidivism are in the U.S.?
Look to:
The Annual Probation Survey and Annual Parole Survey
These BJS surveys provide national- and state-level data for all 50 states, the federal system, and the District of Columbia. Data includes:
Number of adults on state and federal probation or parole on a given day.
Number of adults entering and exiting probation and parole supervision each year (and whether they are “exiting” back to incarceration).
The Robina Institute’s Profiles in Parole Release and Revocation
Much of the data we rely on come in the form of hard numbers. Descriptive data (i.e., data that tells the story about a topic or provides policy details) can also be valuable. The Robina Institute at the University of Minnesota tells the story of parole through detailed state profiles, produced between 2016-2019. They offer profiles of each of the 34 states with discretionary parole systems, accessible under the “Area of Expertise” tab on the website. Each profile describes a state’s release and revocation system, centralizing many important details about parole eligibility, hearings, and post-release policies. Additionally, the Robina Institute produced a detailed report in 2014 about probation policies and practices - including revocation - in 21 states.
Council of State Government Justice Center’s Confined and Costly
This site offers a national and state-by-state analysis of how probation and parole violations fill prisons and burden budgets in 2019. Data includes:
Number and percent of state prison populations and annual admissions to prison that are due to supervision violations.
Breakdowns of the types of violations (i.e., technical violations vs. new offenses, probation vs. parole violations).
Estimated annual cost to states for incarcerating people for violations.
Data does not include the impact on local jails.
The National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) Data Archive
In addition to providing information about who comes into contact with the police (see NSDUH under Police Contact for the full description of this survey), this annual survey is useful for learning about the characteristics (race, gender, health status, drug use, etc.) of people with recent probation and parole histories.
Digging Deeper
Resources to help you better understand the collateral consequences of incarceration
Readers interested in understanding the collateral consequences of incarceration in their state and elsewhere can start with the Collateral Consequences Resource Center’s Restoration of Rights Project. This project doesn’t provide statistics, but it provides state-by-state analysis of laws and practices related to restoration of rights and status following arrest and conviction. The site includes a series of 50-state comparison charts that reveal national patterns, and it also releases periodic reports on new enactments. Another useful resource is the National Inventory of Collateral Consequences of Conviction. It provides data on statutes and regulations that impose collateral consequences in all 50 states, the federal system, and the District of Columbia.
Recidivism of State Prisoners
This BJS series of reports provides the data from several studies that track samples of incarcerated people released from state prisons. The studies document the arrest, conviction, and incarceration experiences of the formerly incarcerated people within and outside of the state that released them. Several “waves” have been studied; most recently, BJS published a 5-year follow-up report about people released from prisons in 34 states in 2012 and a 10-year follow-up report about people released in 24 states in 2008.
The demographics of the youth incarcerated in your state? The reason they’re incarcerated? How long they’ve been incarcerated?
Whether gender impacts time spent in detention?
The patterns of racial disparity across the country? How states compare on this topic?
Look to:
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention’s Statistical Briefing Book
This office provides national, state, and county level information on juvenile crime, victimization, incarceration, court caseloads, and residential placement facilities. Some key web tools include:
Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (EZACJRP), based on a study conducted every other year, provides state and national data on the characteristics of youth held in juvenile facilities, including demographics, length of stay, and the most serious committing offense. The tool features state profiles, state comparisons, and national crosstabs (which is useful for identifying relationships between variables like race and time in detention).
Easy Access to Juvenile Populations provides overall youth population profiles on a national, state, and county level with the functionality to compare states or counties. These numbers are helpful for comparing the statistics from the EZACJRP to the overall youth population in various geographies (for example, when trying to determine racial and ethnic disproportionality in the juvenile justice context).
The W. Haywood Burns Institute’s United States of Disparities
This data project organizes the information compiled by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Prevention to highlight racial disparities in states across the country. Users can click on any state on a color-coded map to access a detailed state profile that includes one-day counts, annual decision points, detention status, reform efforts, and state advisory groups.
The Annie E. Casey Foundation’s Kids Count Data Center
This site collects data about youth populations in the U.S. Although this project is not focused on the criminal legal system, it allows users to create custom reports that include national, state, county, and city data on youth populations in correctional settings. Users can choose a location on the landing page and under topics select filters “Safety and Risky Behaviors” and “Juvenile Justice.”
Survey of Jails in Indian Country
Who's in jail on tribal lands? For what and for how long? How many people die in these jails? The Survey of Jails in Indian Country answers these questions. The survey is used to produce the annual Jails in Indian Country series, which include state- and facility-specific population data.
How many people U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are arresting? How long immigrants are being detained?
The number of cases pending in immigration courts? The length of time it takes to resolve cases?
What the nationalities are for immigrants awaiting the resolution of their court cases at home compared to those who are detained pending their dispositions?
Look to:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
ICE is required by law to make certain records public. Their website regularly updates spreadsheets that you can download by navigating to the pages below.
The Dedicated and Non-Dedicated Facility spreadsheetis located near the bottom of theFacilities Inspections page under Related Documents. It provides the locations and average daily detainee populations for both ICE facilities and jails contracted by ICE.
Also under Related Documents, the Over 72-hour ICE Detention Facilities spreadsheet lists ICE’s active adult detention facilities that are authorized to hold detainees for longer than 72 hours (this list does not include juvenile or family residential facilities).
Fiscal Year ICE Statistics is located on the Detention Management page under Detention Statistics. It provides data on:
Alternatives to incarceration (counts and average length of time in programs)
Numbers for detention
Booking
Release
Average daily population
Average time detained
The data is organized by disposition, facility type, criminal legal system involvement, and arresting agency. The spreadsheet provides data breakdowns of ICE Facilities that include:
Average time served in each facility.
Number of detainees by classification level.
Threat level by criminal legal system involvement and gender.
National Immigrant Justice Center’s Transparency Project
This organization has obtained thousands of documents through litigation from ICE. Their site features reports and helpful resources to make sense of ICE data in addition to the documents obtained through this organization’s court battles. Key resources include:
Comprehensive ICE Detention Facility Listincludes data on types of contracts, demographics, medical care providers, and inspections history for more than 1,000 federal facilities that detain immigrants, including county jails, Bureau of Prisons facilities, Office of Refugee Resettlement centers, hospitals, and hotels. (Customs and Border Protection facilities are not included.)
Deaths in Detentionreport examines the 15 “Detainee Death Reviews” ICE released from December 2015 through April 2017. Eight of the 15 public death reviews show that inadequate medical care contributed or led to the person’s death. The physicians conducting the analysis also found evidence of substandard medical practices in all but one of the remaining reviews.
Syracuse University’sTRAC Immigration Tools
These tools provide statistics and graphs related to ICE, Customs and Border Protection enforcement, and immigration courts.
The Prison Policy Initiative’s Immigration Research Library curates the research we’ve found about the incarceration of immigrants and immigration enforcement.
What agencies in your area have the data you need?
How to file records requests with local agencies? What to expect from records request processes?
The most recent data on your topic?
Look to:
Agency Websites
Local government websites vary in the amount of helpful data they provide, but they’re often the best place to begin. If you want to know the daily population counts for your local jail, check the sheriff’s or jail’s website to see if this information is available. If you want to know the arrest rates in your city, the website of your local police department mayprovide this information.
The Prison Policy Initiative’s Correctional Facility Locator 2020 provides a searchable list of state and county correctional facilities. In addition, this resource allows you to see the growth of prison populations from 2010 to 2020.
Muckrock
This site catalogues requests for records that have been made to local (as well as state and federal) agencies. It shows the status of those requests, shows correspondence between the requester and the government agency, and maintains digital copies of information that the agency provided. A search of this site can let you know if the information you’re looking for has already been requested and supplied.
Looking for data about courts?
Resources to help you collect data about court processes
The Prison Policy Initiative doesn’t often use data about court processes. Advocates interested in data on prosecutors can begin their search with Fair and Just Prosecution, and those interested in public defense systems can begin with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Although we receive very few requests about court processes, we do want to lift up one advocate-focused resource related to court decision-making: Mapping Pretrial Injustice. It tracks details about pretrial risk assessment tools used in a limited number of U.S. states and counties, including information about the developer, the variables that are weighted by the tool, and the scoring system. You can request the database containing this information by emailing info@pretrialrisk.com. In addition, the Measure for Justice Data Portal offers court case data including percentage of cases dismissed, time to disposition, racial and ethnic disparities, and much more (when available) for 20 states at both the state and county-level.
State Statistical Analysis Centers
These sites exist in every U.S. state except Texas.3 They collect, analyze, and report statistics on crime and justice. The information reported varies by state, but it’s worth checking to see if your state provides useful local data about the criminal legal system. The institutions that serve as state Statistical Analysis Centers may also be able to answer your questions about what information is available and how to access it.
Council of State Governments Justice Center’s Justice Counts dashboards
This site compiles admissions, release, and population data about prisons, jails, probation, and parole. The state and county coverage is not uniformly helpful, but Justice Counts provides a good litmus test for the availability of state data and is especially useful for identifying the current data gaps in each state. For example, it points to which of these state-level data are aggregated, publicly available, and accessible without requiring records requests.
Other state-specific organizations
Other state-based organizations collect and make accessible detailed information and data. Finding these organizations can often help you avoid replicating work that they’ve already done. For example, in New York, the Correctional Association of New York has a detailed data dashboard that includes information on the number of people incarcerated, unusual incidents, and more.
Appendices
Appendix A: Data sources on crime rates
Name of data source
Published by
Populations
Basic unit(s) of analysis
Type of data (self-reported, administrative, media reports, other)
Level(s) of data (National, state, county, city, etc.)
Demographic breakdowns offered
Special topics covered
Frequency of data publication
Earliest data easily accessible online
Crime Data Explorer (Uniform Crime Reporting Program and National Incident-Based Reporting System data)
FBI
U.S. population
Offenses known to law enforcement; persons arrested
Reported by law enforcement agencies
National, state, region, city, individual agency (including university/college)
Sex, age, race, urbanicity of area, offense type and characteristics.
Homicide victims, offenders, and circumstances; hate crime; trends over time. Additional data are available from the same website about police employees, assaults on law enforcement officers, human trafficking, cargo theft, and more.
Annual or more frequently. Depending on participation rates among law enforcement agencies, some data are reported quarterly (i.e. if fewer than 60% of agencies participate, certain data are not reported).
1985
National Crime Victimization Survey
BJS
Individuals age 12 and older, households. Does not include people in military barracks or correctional facilities.
Victimizations (persons and households reporting victimization)
Self-reported
National, region
Age, sex, race, education, employment, family income, marital status, military history, type of crime, severity of crime.
Personal and household victimization, excluding homicide; injuries and losses; time and location of crime; medical expenses incurred; victim-offender(s) relationship; characteristics of offender(s); self-protective actions taken by the victim and results of those actions; whether crime was reported to police and reasons for reporting or not reporting; offender use of weapons, drugs, or alcohol.
Annual since 1973.
1992
Law Enforcement Agency Reported Crime Analysis Tool (based on National Incident-Based Reporting System data)
Individuals age 12 and older, households. Does not include people in military barracks or correctional facilities.
Victimizations (persons and households reporting victimization)
Self-reported
National, region
Individual: sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, race/Hispanic origin combined, household income, marital status, offense type, population size of area, region. Household: Head of household's sex, age, race, Hispanic origin, race/Hispanic origin combined; household income, household size, population size of area, region.
Personal and household victimization, excluding homicide; injury; location of incident; medical treatment of injuries; presence of a weapon and weapon category; victim services; victim-offender relationship; trends over time.
Annual
1993
Appendix B: Data sources on police contact
Name of data source
Published by
Populations
Basic unit(s) of analysis
Type of data (self-reported, administrative, media reports, other)
Level(s) of data (National, state, county, city, etc.)
Demographic breakdowns offered
Special topics covered
Frequency of data publication
Earliest data easily accessible online
Police-Public Contact Survey (supplement to NCVS)
BJS
Individuals age 16 and older
Instances of police-resident contact
Self-reported from national sample of U.S. population
National
Sex, age, race/ethnicity, household income.
Type of contact (traffic vs street stop, etc.); reason for contact; experience of nonfatal threats or use of force during contact; perception of force as necessary or excessive.
Periodically since 1996 (about every 3 years). Last year of data available is 2018.
1996
National Survey of Drug Use and Health Data Archive
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. population
Mental health and substance abuse disorders
Self-reports from U.S. residents
National
N/A.
Extensive list of cross-referenceable topics that include age of last drug use, drug use in past 12 months, number of times booked in a jail in past 12 months, and serious psychological stress in past 12 months.
Annual
1998
Mapping Police Violence
Mapping Police Violence (NGO)
U.S. population
Killings by police
Collected from use-of-force databases and supplemented by independent research
National, state, region, city
Race, sex
Armed status, type of force used, police agency involved, whether an officer was charged, and police encounter type (violent, nonviolent, unknown, etc.).
Updated every weekend.
2013
Police Scorecard
U.S. population
Arrests and police violence by race, disparities in arrests for low level offenses by race and ethnicity, and more.
Collected from numerous government databases and the Mapping Police Violence database, supplemented by local agency publications and media reports
National, state, region, city
Race, ethnicity, offense, sex
Police funding, police violence and use of force, police killings, police misconduct complaints, police use of less-lethal force, race/ethnic disparities in low level offense arrests, total arrests by type, rate of solved homicides, and more.
Drug and alcohol treatment, mental and physical health treatment, institutional programs, rules violations.
Periodic. Last year of data available is 2016.
1974
National Inmate Survey
BJS
U.S. prison and jail populations
Individuals with substance abuse issues, individuals with mental health issues.
Self-reports from incarcerated people
National
Age, educational attainment, marital status, race/ethnicity, sex, conviction status, arrest frequency, type of offense.
Treatment type, sentence length, and time served.
Sporadic. Last year of data available is 2012.
2007
Mortality in Correctional Institutions
BJS
U.S. prison and jail populations
Deaths
Reported by prison and jail officials
National, state
Age, sex, race/ethnicity, committing offense(s), conviction status, medical status (pre-existing conditions).
Cause of death
Inactive. Last year of data available is 2017.
2000
Reuters Investigates' Dying Inside
Reuters
U.S. jail population (excluding Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont)
Deaths
Reported by prison and jail officials through records requests, supplemented by independent research.
National, state, county
Age, race, custody status.
Cause of death
No publication schedule available. Last year of data available is 2019.
2008
Huffington Post's Jail Deaths Database
Huffington Post
U.S. jail population
Deaths
Publicly available data through news reports and records requests.
National, state
Age, sex, conviction status.
Cause of death, facility where death occurred.
Inactive. Last year of data available is 2016.
2015
Appendix F: Data sources on probation, parole, and reentry
Name of data source
Published by
Populations
Basic unit(s) of analysis
Type of data (self-reported, administrative, media reports, other)
Level(s) of data (National, state, county, city, etc.)
Demographic breakdowns offered
Special topics covered
Frequency of data publication
Earliest data easily accessible online
Annual Probation Survey and Annual Parole Survey
BJS
U.S. community supervision population
Adults on parole/probation
Reported by correctional agencies
National, state
Race/ethnicity, sex, supervision status, offense type, most serious offense.
Adults exiting from probation/parole by type (completion, incarceration, death, etc.), Adults entering probation/parole by type.
Annual
1980
Robina Institute's Profiles in Parole Release & Revocation
Robina Institute of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
N/A
State profiles
Reported by correctional agencies
State
N/A
Length of probation sentences, risk assessment tools, international comparisons, ranking of release factors in order of importance.
Publication schedule unavailable. Last year of data available is 2019.
2013
Justice Center's Confined and Costly
Council of State Governments
N/A
Prison admissions for parole/probation violations, annual cost
Reported by correctional agencies
National, state
N/A
N/A
Publication schedule unavailable. Last year of data available is 2017.
2017
National Survey of Drug Use and Health Data Archive
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. population
Mental health and substance abuse disorders
Self-reports from U.S. residents
National
N/A
Extensive list of cross-referenceable topics that include age of last drug use, drug use in past 12 months, number of times booked in a jail in past 12 months, and serious psychological stress in past 12 months.
Annual
1998
Recidivism of State Prisoners
BJS
Formerly incarcerated population
Adults re-arrested
Reported by correctional agencies and FBI
National
Age, race/ethnicity, sex, criminal history, most serious offense committed, type of admission or release.
Recidivism by year(s) after release.
Periodic. Last year of data available is 2012.
1983
Appendix G: Data sources on youth incarceration
Name of data source
Published by
Populations
Basic unit(s) of analysis
Type of data (self-reported, administrative, media reports, other)
Level(s) of data (National, state, county, city, etc.)
Demographic breakdowns offered
Special topics covered
Frequency of data publication
Earliest data easily accessible online
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention's Statistical Briefing Book
Appendix I: Data sources on immigrant incarceration
Name of data source
Published by
Populations
Basic unit(s) of analysis
Type of data (self-reported, administrative, media reports, other)
Level(s) of data (National, state, county, city, etc.)
Demographic breakdowns offered
Special topics covered
Frequency of data publication
Earliest data easily accessible online
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
ICE
Immigrants
Immigrants detained, detention facilities, average daily population, court cases, removals.
Reported by ICE
National, state, city
Criminal legal status
Release types (bonded out, own recognizance), community supervision, length of stay, date of last facility inspection, facility types.
Updated monthly.
2018
Transparency Project
National Immigrant Justice Center
Immigrants
Immigrants detained, detention facilities, average daily population, removals, deaths in detention.
Reported by Department of Homeland Security through private legal action
National, state, city
Age, sex
Facility rating and date of last inspection, facility types.
Publication schedule unavailable. Last year of data available is 2017.
2007 for document requests. 2017 for facility counts.
TRAC Immigration Tools
Syracuse University
Immigrants
Arrests, removals, cases.
Reported by government agencies through private legal action
National, state, county
Age, time in U.S., family unit status (child or adult), marital status, citizenship, gender, entry status, custody status, criminal conviction.
Method of arrest, disposition, time in custody.
Publication schedule unavailable. Last year of data available is 2018 for enforcement data, 2019 for detention data, and 2021 for court data.
1998 for deportation proceedings. 2004 for removals. 2005 for arrests.
Footnotes
One important caveat: the sample does not include two groups of people likely to be arrested - those in “group quarters” (like jails, prisons, and hospitals) and houseless people who don’t use shelters. The estimated number of people who have been arrested in the past year, for example, should be interpreted as a minimum estimate. ↩
There are three accepted ways to measure prison system capacity. Some states chose to report one, two, or all three of these capacity measures to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. According to the definitions used in Prisoners in 2022, the three major capacity measurements can be defined as:
Rated capacity: the number of people or beds a facility can hold, as set by a rating official;
Operational capacity: The number of people a facility can hold based on staffing and services;
Design capacity: The number of people a facility can hold, as set by the architect or planner.
These three stated capacities can vary greatly within a state. For example, the BJS reports that the design capacity of the Alabama prison system (set by the architect or planner) is 12,115 people, while the operational capacity (based on staffing and service levels) is 22,255 people. In its report, the BJS calculated what percentage of the capacity each jurisdiction was operating at for each of the three definitions of capacity. In a state like Alabama, this can create a wide range — the BJS calculated that in December 2022, the state was operating at 93% of capacity, based on the stated operational capacity, and 171% based on the stated design capacity. But by any measure, there are too many people in Alabama’s prisons. ↩
The U.S. Virgin Islands also has a SAC, but other U.S. territories—Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and Guam—do not. ↩