New research: More evidence that county jail incarceration harms health, raising death rates

The health burdens of jail expansion are heaviest in places that already lock a lot of people up. Those places also would see the largest benefits from decarceration, including fewer deaths each year.

by Jacob Kang-Brown, June 24, 2025

It is tough to get nationally-representative, individual-level data on incarceration’s health impacts. But researchers are increasingly providing evidence that the criminalization of poverty, addiction, and mental health issues has sharp harmful consequences. Jailing in general is associated with higher mortality (death) rates. At the community level, higher levels of jailing causes more communicable and noncommunicable disease, mortality, and harms maternal health. For individual people, jailing has major impacts on mental health and maternal-child health.

bar chart showing that the risk of death increases by 39 percent for people who were incarcerated, and the risk of overdose death increases by 208 percent,

A new cohort study by a group of scholars at the U.S. Census Bureau, the Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, and the medical school at Mount Sinai published in the medical research journal, JAMA Network Open adds to the evidence and has important local policy implications. This study, led by Dr. Utsha Khatri, found that people incarcerated on a given day in 2008 had a 39% higher risk of death compared to similar people who were not incarcerated, and their risk of overdose death was 208% higher. Additionally, the paper suggests that expanding the use or size of local jails is associated with more deaths county-wide. These nationally-representative findings build upon previous research linking incarceration and mortality.

What makes this paper particularly useful for policymakers and advocates is its effort to measure the impacts of both individual experiences of incarceration and county jail incarceration rates. County jail rates measure how much a given county relies on jailing as a response to issues of health and safety.1 How counties use their jails varies widely across the United States; the jail incarceration rate in Nashville is over five times the rate in Minneapolis, to cite just one example.2 This new study drew county-level jail rates from the Vera Institute’s Incarceration Trends Project dataset and leveraged local variation to better understand how jails impact death rates, breaking out overdose deaths for special attention. One caveat worth noting on the individual-level impacts: because millions of people flow through local jails each year, the findings in the study may understate the harms of incarceration.3

Methodology

The paper pulls from the Mortality Disparities in American Communities study. This dataset linkage effort connects restricted records from the Census with data from the National Death Registry. Khatri et al.’s sample is 3.2 million people who responded to the American Community Survey in 2008, including 45,000 people who were incarcerated at the time they were surveyed. Everyone was tracked through the end of 2019 to see if they survived.

Read the entire methodology

The survival analysis research design compares people who were incarcerated with similar people who were not incarcerated, nesting everyone within similar counties. At the individual level, the authors adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, employment, marital status, household income, and educational attainment. The county-level measures included jail incarceration rates, the percentage of the county who reported being Black or African American, average household size, population density, and poverty rate. Because this is not an experimental or quasi-experimental research design, the observed associations are not causal claims. In other words, the authors don’t attempt to show higher jail rates or the experience of incarceration as the cause of the increase in deaths they observed; they simply show the strength of the relationship between those variables.

Limitations

The United States does not track everyone who has been incarcerated in a centralized database that social or medical researchers can access. Lacking that, the single-day measurement of incarceration based on a single day in 2008 creates some issues: this leads to error that would likely cause the authors to under-estimate the harmful impact of incarceration on health. Some of the people that are in the “non-incarcerated” control group at the time of the survey would have been formerly incarcerated, and others would become incarcerated later, between the time of the survey and the end of the study period in 2019. Thus, these measures would probably underestimate the statistical association between incarceration and increased mortality. Because jail stays are typically quite short (often days or weeks, with an average stay of 32 days), we know a far larger number of people are impacted by incarceration each year than are counted on a single day. Nonetheless, this study provides evidence that is consistent with other research that more jailing causes health harms even to people who were not locked up.

Health harms of incarceration affect everyone, making jail expansion versus decarceration a matter of life and death

This study found that people incarcerated on a single day in 2008 had a 39% higher risk of death — and a 208% higher risk of death by overdose — compared to similar people who were not incarcerated. These results are from models that adjust for individual- and county-level factors, and it’s worth noting that having been incarcerated had a much stronger impact on risk of death than other measures linked to death rates like income, education, or indigeneity (that is, whether one identifies as American Indian or Alaska Native). Similarly, the estimated impact of incarceration on overdose mortality was higher than many other individual-level risk factors.

 

  • bar chart showing that incarceration increases risk of death by 39 percent, more than poverty, not finishing high school, and identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native, which each raise the risk by about 10 percent
  • bar chart showing that incarceration increases risk of overdose death by 208 percent, more than divorce or separation, not finishing high school, and poverty

The elevated risk of death from overdose after incarceration is well documented: criminalization of addiction causes a lot of harm. But other research has shown that incarceration is associated with a wide range of health issues, which may help explain the increased risk of death from any cause. People are entering and exiting the toxic prison and jail environment all the time, either upon their arrest and release or as staff clock in and clock out. Other studies have found links between incarceration and health outcomes ranging from:

This study by Khatri et al. also found county-level jail incarceration was associated with an increase in deaths generally. The researchers estimate that a local jail incarceration rate 10% higher than the national county average leads to a 0.45% increased risk of death across the board. While this is much smaller than the 39% higher risk for people that were incarcerated, it applies to all people. The authors do the math and it works out to an additional 4.6 people dying for every 100,000 people in the population a year. This relationship is linear: for each 10% increment over the average, a county experiences another 4.6 additional deaths per 100,000 people, so a county with a jail rate 20% higher than average could expect 9.2 additional deaths per 100,000 and so on. Because large increases in jailing are common after new jail construction, and many counties have sustained lower jail rates after COVID-related changes in 2020, it’s worth applying this finding to larger numbers and the associated annual numbers of deaths.

bar chart showing that while a 50 percent increase in Baldwin County's jail rate could lead to 57 more deaths per year, a sustained 25 percent decrease in Contra Costa County's jail rate could reduce deaths by about 52 per year

Comparing two suburbs can illuminate the relationship between jail rates and county deaths: Contra Costa County, in the San Francisco Bay Area, reduced its jail population by 25% between 2019 and 2024. In contrast, Baldwin County, Ala. (between Mobile and Pensacola) is opening a new jail this summer that will expand capacity by 50%. The study from Khatri et al. suggests Contra Costa’s 25% jail population reduction (on top of an already relatively low incarceration rate) could translate to an average of 52 fewer county residents dying each year as a result of the harms from the jail. For perspective, Contra Costa averaged 47 homicides a year over the last decade, so this would be a meaningful change. Conversely, if the number of people in the Baldwin County jail increases by 50% to fill up the new facility, this study suggests an additional 57 deaths in the county each year. Given there were only 20 murders in the county in 2023, this would be quite a concerning increase.

For people who live in counties considering steps to reduce criminalization, pretrial detention, and overall jail capacity, this research provides clear evidence of the harms of incarceration. Jail construction is expensive and tends to crowd out public investment in other needs like community-based healthcare. Criminalization of addiction doesn’t address problematic substance use, and better community-based treatment options are needed. Moreover, some studies suggest jail construction leads to even more criminalization rather than deterring crime. Decarceration is one of the best tools to combat early deaths caused by this dynamic between criminalization, incarceration, and austerity — what geographer Ruth Wilson Gilmore terms “organized state abandonment.” By comparing the number of deaths due to the harms of incarceration to the numbers of murders reported, we can get a sense of the scale of this abandonment. Communities across the United States don’t have to tolerate these burdens of incarceration. Instead, as this new paper suggests, working to reduce jailing could help improve community health.

Footnotes

  1. In addition, some counties also use their local jails like private prisons, providing space to incarcerate people on contracts with the state prisons, federal agencies like ICE, or other counties in exchange for payments to cover their operating costs.
     ↩

  2. Nashville, Tennessee’s surrounding county, Davidson, had 299 people in jail per 100,000 in spring 2024. Minneapolis, Minnesota’s county, Hennepin, had 58 people in jail per 100,000 residents in spring 2024. The 2024 data is sourced from Vera’s Incarceration Trends Project, an older version of which was used by Khatri et al. in their study.
     ↩

  3. For more on this, see the discussion of limitations in the methodology below.  ↩

Jacob Kang-Brown is a Senior Researcher at the Prison Policy Initiative. (Other articles | Full bio | Contact)

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comments are moderated and there may be a delay before your comment appears. There is no need to resubmit your comment.



Stay Informed


Get the latest updates:



Share on 𝕏 Donate